Yawl
From Kristos Vocabulary Booster
English
Noun
yawl
- A small ship's boat, usually rowed by four or six oars.
Verb
yawl
- To cry out; to howl;
In article <7057558D-7E50-44CB-BDC6-F1B327301D65@srcbs.org>,
lsenders@hotmail.com says...
>
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>>
>> There isn't a single doctrine of the church which is anti-Scriptural
>> (or unScriptural for that matter).
>>
>Baptismal regeneration!
And there is NOTHING 'anti-scriptural' about that! Nothing at all. But you, no
doubt, will continue to insist it is, most probably because as SO often, you
insist on the intellectual dishonesty by applying your own false definition of
'regeneration' to make a straw-man argument.
--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
In article <094.45.19.05.536473000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...
[snip]
>> For this will not work on many, on those described in the Proberb "those
>> who hate reproofs will die" (Prv 15:10). Alas, I fear that fits
>> 'basicallyblue' to a T.
>That may be. But I refuse to be guided by fear.
Good for you. But you are not the only reader in the NG. You must take into
account the effect on the other readers too.
>> And what else are we to think, when he claims to have refuted us, when the
>> record in Google shows he has not? Or when he claims we never refuted him,
>> when the same record shows we did, and he either ignored our refutations,
>> or dismissed them with arrogant sniping? Again, such behavior fits Prv
>> 15:10 to a T.
>
>And I'm sure, to BB, that the feeling is mutual.
So what? 'Feelings' are a very poor guide. A man who trusts his own unreliable
feelings is very far from the saving doctrine of the Trinity, which is far, far
more than an intellectual cognition.
>Do you think that any of us will be able to show BB the truth of the DoT
>by focusing on his behavior?
You miss the point. I don't think it is possible at all. Not, at least, until he
stops his brazen dishonesty. But if it is possible at all, then it can ONLY be
done by focusing on his behavior, since it is his behavior that reveals his
_+real+_ barriers to embracing the life-saving dogma of the Trinity.
>
>>
>> Recall, the Proverb says:
>>
>> Wicked doctrine for him who deserts the Way;
>> he who hates rebukes shall die (Prv 15:10)
>>
>> And if observing this fact is 'ad hominem', then I have to say that the
>> prohibition of 'ad hominem' is contrary to biblical ethics, too.
>
>This is a general statement, which we both agree with. But when you
>take it from the general principle and apply it to a specific
>individual, based upon what you think his internal state is, it becomes
>ad hominem.
You didn't look up the definition on the website I gave you, did you?
[snip]
--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
