All articles

From Kristos Vocabulary Booster

In article <7057558D-7E50-44CB-BDC6-F1B327301D65@srcbs.org>,
lsenders@hotmail.com says...
>
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>>
>> There isn't a single doctrine of the church which is anti-Scriptural
>> (or unScriptural for that matter).
>>
>Baptismal regeneration!

And there is NOTHING 'anti-scriptural' about that! Nothing at all. But you, no
doubt, will continue to insist it is, most probably because as SO often, you
insist on the intellectual dishonesty by applying your own false definition of
'regeneration' to make a straw-man argument.


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

nnalyd@yahoo.com wrote:


> I wrote:
> Ignatius calls Almighty God "the only true God, the unbegotten and
> unapproachable, the Lord of all, the Father and Begetter of the
> only-begotten Son," showing the distinction between God and His Son.
> He speaks of "God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ." And he
> declares: "There is one God, the Almighty, who has manifested Himself
> by Jesus Christ His Son."
>
> ******Ignatius shows that the SON WAS NOT ETERNAL AS A PERSON BUT WAS
> CREATED, for he has the Son saying: "The Lord [Almighty God] created
> Me, the beginning of His ways."*****

More contradictions. Your own quote says that God manifested
_Himself_ by Jesus. Let me guess, you deny the Holocost too.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))