Nammu

From Kristos Vocabulary Booster

After the sumerian mythology, around year 4000 BC, a sumerian couple lived in Dilmun (identified today as the isle of Bahrain) : Nammu and her husband An.

After her death, Nammu became the Goddess of the sea (abzu) and An became the God of the Sky. Nammu was the mother and ancestor of all the sumerian gods. Nammu will be later called : Ningal and An : Nanna (their Akkadian names).

interesting link : http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mythology/assyrbabyl-faq/

In article <984B9174-B6A4-C1C9-FCEB-0E17D354649D@srcbs.org>,
Sarah Kanary says...

>"dell12345" wrote in message
>news:6EE9FE78-665A-AF59-EE11-C3C7898BDD70@srcbs.org... >
>Jesus is rightly called God (in the sense of Mighty God, >
>not Almighty God) and only-begotten god (John 1:18).

[snip]

>> In this same chapter (20:17) Jesus said: "I am ascending
>> to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God."


>> The illustration is still valid, human judges at Bible
>> times are called "gods". See Psalms 82.

>Right on!

So: you are taking the role of JW cheerleader now?

> The apostle John, as all Jews, worshiped Jehovah
>ONLY.

Of course. But since, as you even admit yourself, Jesus
Christ is the PERFECT image of the Father, all worship to
Jesus CHrist is reflected PERFECTLY to the Father.

What did you THINK "perfect image" meant?

> John also recorded the prayer of Jesus Christ. The idea
>of Jehovah bowing His head in prayer would be preposterous.

No, it is not. Or, if it is, it is no more 'preposterous'
than the many other things Christ did that shocked the Jews.

> To whom, then, would Jesus, a Jew, be praying? To the
>only God a Jew could pray without being stoned to death:
>Jehovah! In his prayer to Jehovah, Jesus addressed Him as
>"the *only* true God."

And this is exactly what He did. He prayed, acting in
accordance with His human nature, to the one true God.

>An interesting note on Isaiah 9:6: The LXX, used by
>first-century Christians, did not say "the mighty God", but
>instead, said "megales boules angelos" meaning 'ANGEL of
>Mighty Counsel.'


No, it means MESSENGER of mighty counsel.

Besides: that SAME LXX says we were saved not by an angel,
not by an ambassador, but by God himself. But you insist
that our savior is really an Archangel. See Isa 63:9.


--
---------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)


((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))