Maltese
From Kristos Vocabulary Booster
| Table of contents |
English
Derivation
Pronunciation
| IPA | SAMPA | |
|---|---|---|
| GenAm | /ˌmɑlˈtiz/ | /%mAl"tiz/ |
Noun
Maltese (plural: Maltese)
Translations
- Chinese:马耳他人 (mǎrtā-rén, 1), 马耳他语 (mǎrtā-yǔ, 2)
- Dutch: maltees
- French: Maltais m (1), Maltaise f (1), maltais m (2)
- German: Malteser m (1), Malteserin f (1), Maltesisch n (2)
- Greek, Modern: Μαλτέζος (Maltezos, 1)
- Latin: Melitensis
- Polish: maltański m (1); język maltański (2)
Adjective
- Pertaining to Malta or its language.
Translations
- Chinese: 马耳他的 (mǎrtā-de)
- French: maltais m, maltaise f
- German: maltesisch
- Latin: Melitensis
See Also
entr@py.invalid wrote:
>> >That's baloney.
>>
>> Wrong. The 'baloney' is yours.
>
> Proof by assertion. One of your trademarks.
Heh heh. Nice to start my day off with a chuckle. Want to
explain how his assertion and tactics are different from yours?
Bart
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
Stephen M. Adams wrote:
>
> Doctrines that contradict scriptures are false doctrines.
You mean things like evolution?
>The problem
> is that pretty much every group claims to follow the Scriptures. No
> matter WHAT they teach.
>
This is why, ever so long ago, I posted a rather lengthy and intricate
paper on SRC on the issue of methodology or hermeneutics. It is
because there are different schools of interpretation that we have
differences. Even within the various schools, individuals do not
always adhere to their exegetical principles.
But for the common man, the biggest problem I see all too often is the
confusion between interpretation and application. Preachers by in
large do not exegete the passages they teach from. Rather, they draw
an analysis and make an application. Thus their congregations follow
suit when they read the scriptures for themselves.
An example. In last weeks sunday school, the topic of creationism vs
traducianism arose (not that any one there understood it as such).
Some one led the class from Gen 3 over to 1 Tim 2:13, 14. Nothing
wrong with that. I amended a comment that the fall involved the
federal nature of Adam but pointing out that Christ was born of a
woman, not a man. After class a woman came up to me and pointed to v.
15, saying, "See! This correlates with the traducian model."
(paraphrasing, of course :).
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
