Korean
From Kristos Vocabulary Booster
| Table of contents |
English
Noun
Korean (Koreans)
- Official language of the people residing on the Korean Peninsula, and language of approximately 60 million peoples, in Asia, North America, and elsewhere.
- Designation given to the indigenous or naturalized people occupying the Korean Peninsula on the Asian continent, in either North Korea or South Korea.
Alternate spellings
Translations
- Chinese: 韓語 (hán yǔ), 朝鮮語 (cháoxiān yǔ) (1), 韓人 (hán rén), 朝鮮人 (cháoxiān rén) (2)
- Dutch: Koreaan m (1), Koreaanse f (1), Koreaans n (2)
- Esperanto: Koreano m (1), Koreanino f (1)
- Finnish: korea (1), korean kieli (1), korealainen (2)
- French: coréen m (1); Coréen m, Coréenne f (2)
- German: Koreanisch (1), Koreaner m (2), Koreanerin f (2)
- Greek: Κορεατικά (koreatika), Κορεάτης (2)
- Indonesian: bahasa Korea (1), orang Korea (2)
- Italian: coreano (1, 2)
- Japanese: 韓国語 (かんこくご, kankoku-go)(1,South), 朝鮮語 (ちょうせんご, chōsen-go)(1, North or academic); 韓国人 (かんこくじん, kankoku-jin) (2, South)
- Korean:
- Malay: bahasa Korea (1), orang Korea (2)
- Portuguese: coreano m (1); coreano m, coreana f (2)
- Polish: koreański(1), koreańczyk m & koreanka f(2)
- Russian: корейский (koreyskiy)
- Spanish: coreano m, coreana f
- Swedish: koreanska (1, 2 f), korean (2 m)
See also
Wikipedia article on the Korean language
Adjective
Korean
- Referring to the Korean Peninsula on the Asian continent, in either North Korea or South Korea.
Translations
- Arabic: كوري
- Dutch: Koreaans, Koreaanse
- Finnish: korealainen
- French: coréen m, coréenne f
- German: koreanisch
- Indonesian: Korea
- Italian: coreano
- Korean:
- Malay: Korea
- Swedish: koreansk, koreanska (plural and definite form)
External links
- Korean - English Dictionary (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Korean-english/): from Webster's Dictionary (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/) - the Rosetta Edition.
In article <086.36.06.05.437854000@srcbs.org>, basicallyblues says...
>
>
>
>> Nothing to do with theology but scripture itself. Either you believe
>> the Bible contradicts itself or you realize that Enoch being "taken"
>or
>> "transferred" does not mean he didn't die.
>
>>The fallacy of the false dilemma. Those aren't the only two choices.
>
>They most certainly are chap. Either Enoch died or he did not.
But that is a different pair of choices. Who do you think you can fool with such
a childish "bait-and-switch"?
Do I _really_ have to spell this out for you? Are you _really_ so incompetent at
such basic logic? For your _original_ pair of choices, your _false dilemma_, was
1) the Bible contradicts itself 2) 'taken' != 'die'. But _now_ that you decided
to pull a bait-and-switch on us, you are presenting us with a COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT PAIR: 1) Enoch died 2) Enoch did not die.
Not the same at all.
>>In the Greek, Jesus is saying that no one has ascended by their own
>>direct action and power
>
>not according to how the Greek word "anabaino" is used throughout
>scripture:
Dream on. That does not follow from your examples at all.
>Luke 19:28
>John 1:51
>John 3:13
>John 20:17
>Acts 2:34
>Acts 25:1
>Ephe 4:8,9,10
>Rev. 8:4
>Rev. 11:7,12
>Rev. 14:11
>
>in NONE of these verses do we see a clear usage of "anabaino" as you
>say. No disnction between ascending voluntarily or unvoluntarily.
You have either misunderstood Bob's argument or you are playing another
straw-man game again. Bob did not quite say that the mere use of the word
'anabaino' means "went up on his own power". But he would be right to claim that
without any other modifiers, 'anabaino' _does_ normally mean "to go up on one's
own power".
>> So if Enoch was not in heaven where was he?
>
>>The place of the righteous dead.
>
>and what's that?..where is it?
Finally, an interesting question!
>
>>Whatever the case the Bible says that nobody had gone to heaven
>> prior to 33 c.e.
>
>>The Bible says nothing of the kind.
>
>Sure it does. John 3:13.
We have discussed this one before...
>
>>Where in Scripture does it say that the
>>Most Holy Place is equivalent to all of heaven?
>
>heaven is heaven in this respect as it involved the New Covenant which
>included persons would be bought from the earth to rule with Christ
That makes no sense at all. You are dodging the question. When you stop dodging
the question with such cheap dodges, perhaps, just perhaps, we shall be able to
address the interesting question you _finally_ asked above.
--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
