No such action

From Kristos Vocabulary Booster

The action specified by the URL is not recognized by the wiki

Return to Main Page.

b t wrote:
> Most all translations in various languages have chosen to replace the
> name "Yahweh" with another title or name of their choice, usually "the
> LORD" or "GOD" in all capital letters.
>
> The following is a commentary on the various prefaces and introductions
> which explain their reasoning for removing the Heavenly Father's name
> from English bibles.
>
> Let's start with the ever popular NIV...
> New International Version - Preface
>
>
> quote "In regard to the divine name YHWH, commonly referred to as the
> Tetragrammaton, the translators adopted the device used in most English
> versions... unquote
>
>
> This statement runs true in the majority of modern English translations.
>
> The primary reasoning for replacing the name of Yahweh with something
> else is 'tradition'.
>
> In other words, "As long as everyone else does it, it must be okay".
>
>
> niv quote"..of rendering that name as "LORD" in capital letters to
> distinguish it from adonai, another Hebrew word rendered "Lord" for
> which small letters are used." unquote
>
>
> We can see already that replacing the name "Yahweh" with "The LORD"
> presents a major problem.
>
> What do they do when there is a legitimate use of the title
> "Lord/Master" in the original text?
>
> It might be confusing to the reader as to whether it is speaking of a
> human lord/master or Yahweh.
>
> So what to do?
>
> Their solution is to make the "Adonai" source in small letters and where
> the name of Yahweh exists, they'll put capital letters!
>
> In other words, if it reads "Adonai (lord/master)" In the original they
> will translate it as "lord" or "Lord".
>
> But if it says "Yahweh" in the original, they will render it as "LORD"
> in all capital letters.
>
> I doubt that half the people who read the scriptures even realizes they
> are doing this.
>
>
> niv quote "Wherever the two names stand together in the Old Testament as
> a compound name for God, they are rendered "Sovereign LORD."" "unquote
>
>
> Now we see that a more complicated problem arises.
>
> There are instances in scripture that the Hebrew reads "Adonai Yahweh"
> or "Lord/Master Yahweh".
>
> If they were to put "Lord" where Yahweh exists in the original, they
> would have to translate the passage as "Lord the LORD"!
>
> So they translated it as "Sovereign LORD" to avoid confusion.
>
> Amazing what people will do to serve tradition and reject what Yahweh
> has placed in scripture!
>
>
> Today's English Version - Preface
>
> quote "Following an ancient tradition" unquote
>
> Again, tradition is the reason.
>
> tev quote "begun by the first translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (the
> Septuagint) and followed by the vast majority of English translations,
> the distinctive Hebrew name for God (usually transliterated Jehovah or
> Yahweh), is in this translation represented by "LORD."
>
> When Adonai, normally translated "Lord," occurs preposed to Yahweh, the
> combination is rendered by the phrase "Sovereign LORD." " unquote
>
>
> So the "Today's English Version" uses the same renderings as the NIV.
>
> All on the basis of following the others.
>
>
> Revised English Bible - Introduction to the Old Testament
>
> quote "The divine name (YHWH in Hebrew characters) was probably
> pronounced 'Yahweh'," unquote
>
>
> One excuse some use for not keeping Yahweh's name in the text is that
> they aren't sure His name is really pronounced "Yahweh".
>
> But if a translator ever admitted that His name was definitely
> pronounced 'Yahweh' I'm sure they would have to answer for why they
> don't translate it as such.
>
> Not much motivation for seeking the truth?
>
> Maybe they really don't want to know that His name really is pronounced
> "Yahweh"?
> rev quote "but the name was regarded as ineffable, too sacred to be
> pronounced." unquote
>
>
> Yes, this was the doctrine that got this whole idea started.
>
> But Yahweh says:
>
> Jere 10:25a Pour out thy fury upon the heathen that know thee not,
> and upon the families that call not on thy name..
>
> and...
>
> Joel 2:32a And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever shall call on
> the name of the YAHWEH shall be delivered..
>
>
> How can anyone call on His name if it is hidden away by superstitious
> doctrines?
>
> rev quote "The Massoretes, therefore, wrote in the vowel signs of the
> alternative words adonai ('Lord') or elohim ('God') to warn readers to
> use one of these in its place." unquote
>
>
> The Massoretes were they who copied and preserved the Hebrew scriptures
> from scroll to scroll down through the centuries.
>
> They added 'vowel signs/pointings' to the Hebrew text (which was
> primarily all consonants) so the language would be preserved.
>
> But when they came to the name of Yahweh,
>
> they inserted alternative vowel pointings so that the reader would not
> speak the name of Yahweh but say "adonai" (lord) instead.
>
> So we can see that through the ages,
>
> there has been a conspiracy to hide the name of Yahweh Almighty
>
> despite what Yahweh says in His word
>
> about how we should praise, exalt, bless, love, teach, preach, anoint,
> assemble, believe, give thanks, honor and call on His name.
>
>
> reb quote "Where the divine name occurs in the Hebrew text, this has
> been signalled in The Revised English Bible by using capital letters for
> 'LORD' or 'GOD', a widely accepted practice." unquote
>
>
> Since it is 'widely accepted', it must be truth and acceptable to do?
>
> Not according to Yahushua!
>
> He said the way to life is a narrow way.
>
> Matt 7:14 (NKJV) "Because narrow [is] the gate and difficult [is] the
> way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.
>
>
> American Standard Version - Preface
>
> quote "I. The change first proposed in the Appendix --- that which
> substitutes "Jehovah" for "LORD" and "GOD" (printed in small capitals)
> --- is one which will be unwelcome by many, because of the frequency and
> familiarity of the terms displaced.
>
> But the American Revisers, after a careful consideration, were brought
> to the unanimous conviction that a Jewish superstition, which regarded
> the Divine Name as too sacred to be uttered,
>
> ought no longer to dominate in the English or any other version of the
> Old Testament,
> as it fortunately does not in the numerous versions made by modern
> missionaries." unquote
>
>
> Now with some reservation I would almost have to admire those who
> translated the American Standard 1901 version.
>
> They at least tried to restore some truth
>
> (even though they knew it would be unwelcome)
>
> and reject the ridiculous tradition of hiding and substituting the name
> of Yahweh from the common reader.
>
> But then as we read on...
>
>
> asv quote "This Memorial Name, explained in Ex. iii. 14,15 and
> emphasized as such over and over in the original text of the Old
> Testament,
>
> designates God as the Personal God, as the covenant God, the God of
> Revelation, the Deliverer, the Friend of his people; ---
>
> not merely the abstractly "Eternal One" of many French translations, but
> the ever living Helper of those who are in trouble.
>
> This personal name, with its wealth of sacred associations, is now
> restored to the place in the sacred text to which it has an
> unquestionable claim." unquote
>
>
> Sounds great so far!
>
> They can see that the scriptures do place importance on His name..over
> and over and over...
>
> But if you read the translation you will see that they insert the false
> "Jehovah" rendering that was used a total of 4 times in the King James
> Version!
>
> But most every scholar knows that "Jehovah" is a falsification of
> Yahweh's name!
>
> I will post proof of this in a future post.
>
>
> Revised Standard Version - Preface
>
> Now here is the preface that really bothers me the most.
>
> quote "A major departure from the practice of the American Standard
> Version is the rendering of the Divine Name, the "Tetragrammaton."
> "unquote
>
> The Revised Standard Version translators have chosen not only to depart
> from the practice of the ASV translators but to berate them as well.
>
> It is in one way justified in that the ASV chose the name "Jehovah"
> instead of "Yahweh".
>
> rsv quote "The American Standard Version used the term "Jehovah";
>
> the King James Version had employed this in four places, but everywhere
> else, except in three cases where it was employed as part of a proper
> name, used the English word LORD (or in certain cases GOD) printed in
> capitals.
>
> The present revision returns to the procedure of the King James Version,
> which follows the precedent of the ancient Greek and Latin translators
> and the long established practice in the reading of the Hebrew
> scriptures in the synagogue." unquote
>
> So here we go with this 'long standing tradition' routine again.
>
> I'm not sure why they cannot see where Yahushua told the scribes and
> pharisees on various occasions:
>
> Mark 7:9 He said to them, "All too well you reject the commandment of
> Yahweh, that you may keep your tradition.
>
>
> rsv quote "While it is almost if not quite certain that the Name was
> originally pronounced "Yahweh"," unquote
>
>
> Again, they wouldn't dare admit that they are totally certain.
>
> However it is totally certain that His name is not pronounced "The
> Lord".
>
> rsv quote "(While it is almost if not quite certain that the Name was
> originally pronounced "Yahweh",)..this pronunciation was not indicated
> when the Masoretes added vowel signs to the consonantal Hebrew text."
> unquote
>
> Of course not, they favored tradition over commandments!
>
> rsv quote "To the four consonants YHWH of the Name, which had come to be
> regarded as too sacred to be pronounced,
>
> they attached vowel signs indicating that in its place should be read
> the Hebrew word Adonai meaning "Lord" (or Elohim meaning "God").
>
> The ancient Greek translators substituted the word Kyrios (Lord) for the
> Name. The Vulgate likewise used the Latin word Dominus.
>
> The form "Jehovah" is of late medieval origin; it is a combination of
> the consonants of the Divine Name and the vowels attached to it by the
> Masoretes but belonging to an entirely different word.
>
> The sound of Y is represented by J and the sound of W by V, as in
> Latin."unquote
>
>
> They even share how this idea of substituting His name got started.
>
> It amazes me that some will follow the Jewish tradition that breaks the
> commandment of Yahweh but they'll ignore the Jew's examples of where
> they actually do keep the Torah/Law of Yahweh!
>
>
> rsv quote "For two reasons the Committee has returned to the more
> familiar usage of the King James Version: (1) the word "Jehovah" does
> not accurately present any form of the Name ever used in Hebrew; and"
> unquote
>
>
> Ahh! Notice how they conveniently forget to mention why they reject the
> name "Yahweh" in their 'reasons'!
>
>
> rsv quote "(2) the use of any proper name for the one and only God, as
> though there were other gods from whom He had to be distinguished, was
> discontinued in Judaism before the Christian era
>
> and is entirely inappropriate for the universal faith of the Christian
> Church." " unquote
>
>
> Who are they to decide what is appropriate for one's faith??
>
> Their job is to translate, not decide what we are to believe!
>
> This statement is a sad commentary of how far some have gone from the
> scriptures.
>
> Not only do they say why they have chosen to replace Yahweh's name with
> a title of their choosing
>
> but they also state that 'use of any proper name...is entirely
> inappropriate!'
>
> Amazing!
>
> Who invented the idea of having a name of our Creator?
>
> Is it not Yahweh Himself??
>
> Is Yahweh also 'entirely inappropriate' for placing His name there in
> scripture over 6000 times??
>
> Are they saying indeed that the one whom they claim to worship is
> 'entirely inappropriate' for placing His name there?
> Oh my!
>
> They say it is 'entirely inappropriate for the universal faith of the
> Christian Church.'
>
> Why have a different substitution for the name "Yahweh" in each
> language?
>
> Would it not be more 'universal' to use ONE NAME?
>
> Yahweh has said:
>
> Mala 1:11a (NKJV) For from the rising of the sun, even to its going
> down, My name shall be great among the Gentiles..
>
>
> Why have they falsified our Creator's name and condemned Yahweh for
> putting it there originally?
>
> It is just sad.
>
>
> New King James Version - Word study on Exodus 3:15 (New Open Bible)
>
> Now I do like this word study.
>
> Even though the NKJV translators followed the traditions of the elders
> and forsook the idea of keeping Yahweh's name in the text,
>
> whoever wrote this word study is very frank about what actually is
> taking place.
>
> nkj quote "Exodus 3 records one of the greatest revelations in the Old
> Testament: the personal name of God.
>
> (The words translated God in our Bible [El, Elohim, Eloah] are not
> names, but the standard vocabulary for the Deity and even for false
> gods.
>
> God told Moses His plan to use him in delivering the Israelites from
> Egyptian bondage, and Moses had asked whom He should tell the people had
> sent him.
>
> God answered Moses: "I AM WHO I AM." He told Moses to tell them the "I
> AM" had sent him, "the LORD God."
>
> "I AM" and "LORD" are both probably derived from the Hebrew verb to be
> (hayah) because God is the ever-present One, "the Eternal" (Moffatt
> translation).
>
> Many people are puzzled that in this and many other (over six thousand!)
> passages some Bibles read LORD in all capitals
> (e.g., KJV, NKJV, NIV),
>
> some read "Jehovah" (ASV, DARBY), and some read "Yahweh" (Jerusalem
> Bible).
>
> Why such a radical difference? Do the manuscripts vary that much? No,
> not at all.
>
> Because the name of God is so important---Jews devoutly refer to Him as
> "the Name" (ha Shem)---it is well worth exploring this revelation in
> some detail.
>
> It is merely a question of a Jewish tradition and how various Christian
> Scholars handle that tradition.
>
> In the Ten Commandments, God forbids taking His name "in vain".
>
> That is, we should not bear false witness in oaths and probably should
> avoid using profanity, as well.
>
> In their great fear of violating this command, devout Hebrews went
> beyond the law,
>
> and when they read the Hebrew Scriptures aloud they would read the word
> Lord (Adonai) whenever they saw the four letters (YHWH, or traditionally
> JHVH in Latin pronunciation) that spelled out God's revealed covenant
> name.
>
> This was the sacred name by which He had committed Himself to Israel as
> a nation.
>
> The most ancient copies of the Hebrew text were written in consonants
> only." unquote
>
>
> Actually there are some semi-vowels..as any good book on Hebrew grammar
> will tell you.
>
>
> nkj quote "As the language became less and less used, scholars (call
> Masoretes) added little dots and dashes called "vowel points" to
> indicate how the text was to be pronounced.
>
> Oddly enough, they put the vowels that go with the word Adonai together
> with the sacred four letter name (called "tetragrammaton") to guide the
> readers to say Adonai aloud in synagogue services.
>
> Jehovah
>
> This is the origin of the name "Jehovah." It is actually a hybrid name,
>
> combining the vowels of Adonai with the consonants of YHWH into JeHoVaH
> or YeHoWaH (the "a" of Adonai is changed for reasons of Hebrew
> pronunciation).
>
> The people who produced this name were medieval Christian Hebrew
> Scholars;
>
> the Jews never acknowledged such a name.
>
> The defense of this Christian hybrid is the same as the defense of the
> Jewish avoidance of pronouncing the name---tradition! " unquote
>
>
> No surprise there. (I didn't add the "!")
>
>
> nkj quote "There are many lovely hymns and paraphrases of the Psalms
> that use this name, so it would be a loss to eliminate it from our
> Christian vocabulary." unquote
>
>
> Choose 'what seems right to a man' over the truth?
>
> (I will post a future study on the name "Jehovah")
>
>
> nkj quote "The poetical form of Jehovah is Jah
>
> Yahweh -
>
> It is very likely that the name was pronounced very much like "Yahweh."
>
> Comparisons with transliterations of the name into other alphabets from
> very ancient times confirm this.
>
> The best argument for the spelling is that it is probably the
> historically accurate." unquote
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> nkj quote "However, the RSV's 1952 introduction explained its reason for
> rejecting "Yahweh" in the translation.
>
> It said that it lacks devotional qualities for English-speaking
> Christians.
>
> It is true that many names beginning with "Y" seem odd to our culture
> (all the names in English --- including Jesus---were pronounced with a Y
> sound, in the original, as in "hallelu-Yah"). " unquote
>
>
> Just totally amazing...
>
>
> nkj quote "LORD
>
> Most recent major English Bibles, dissatisfied with both Jehovah and
> Yahweh, have retained the KJV's LORD (the 1901 text read Jehovah.)
> "unquote
>
>
> Oh but Yahweh is certainly dissatisfied with THEM.
>
> They have failed to take in account something very important to HIM.
>
> The following is a summary of the excuses that they have used for their
> refusing to insert the true name Yahweh.
>
>
> It's used in most English versions
>
> We're following an ancient tradition
>
> The word "Jehovah" does not accurately present any form of the Name ever
> used in Hebrew (What about "Yahweh"??)
>
> Use of any proper name...is entirely inappropriate
>
> It lacks devotional qualities
>
>
> Amongst all these reasons, is there not something missing here?
>
> YES, it is something that they have gone over painstakingly word for
> word!
>
> Something called THE WORD OF YAHWEH.
>
> Not once did they quote a scripture to back up their excuses!
>
>
> We have heard the excuses, now let's see what Yahweh's word has to say
> about His name:
>
> 1Kings 18:24-AV And call ye on the name of your elohim, and I will call
> on the name of Yahweh:
>
> and the Elohim that answereth by fire, let him be Elohim.
>
> And all the people answered and said, It is well spoken.
>
>
> Now I would like to touch on something ironic here.
>
> If you haven't read this story of Mt. Carmel, go to your scriptures and
> read it now.
>
> This is the prophet EliYahu (Elijah) speaking these words.
>
> He said "call ye on the name of your elohim, and I will call on the name
> of Yahweh".
>
> What was the name of their elohim?
>
> It is BAAL.
>
> What is amazing here is that Baal means "Lord" in Hebrew!
>
>
> Here is Brown's Driver/Briggs Lexicon on this Hebrew name of "Baal".
>
> 01168 Ba`al {bah�-al}
> the same as 01167; TWOT - 262a
> AV - Baal 62, Baalim 18; 80
> Baal = "lord"
> n pr m
>
> 1) supreme male divinity of the Phoenicians or Canaanites
>
> 2) a Reubenite
>
> 3) the son of Jehiel and grandfather of Saul
>
> n pr loc
>
> 4) a town of Simeon, probably identical to Baalath-beer
>
>
> There is your proof.
>
> What is sad is that the translators RETAINED the name of the idol Baal
>
> but REJECTED the name of the true Mighty One of the Scriptures!
>
>
> Continuing with our scriptures..Yahweh said:
>
> Isai 42:8 I am YAHWEH, that is My name; And My glory I will not give to
> another, Nor My praise to carved images.
>
> Mala 2:2 If you will not hear, And if you will not take it to heart,
> To give glory to My name," Says YAHWEH of hosts,
>
> "I will send a curse upon you, And I will curse your blessings. Yes, I
> have cursed them already, Because you do not take it to heart.
>
> Psal 105:1 Oh, give thanks to YAHWEH! Call upon His name; Make known His
> deeds among the peoples!
>
> Psalms 116:17- I will offer to thee the sacrifice of thanksgiving, and
> will call upon the name of YAHWEH.
>
> Isai 12:4 And in that day you will say: "Praise YAHWEH, call upon His
> name;
> Declare His deeds among the peoples, Make mention that His name is
> exalted.
>
> Zechariah 13:9- And I will bring the third part through the fire, and
> will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is
> tried:
>
> they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It [is] my
> people: and they shall say, Yahweh is my Elohim.
>
>
> This is only a small sampling of the hundreds of scriptures that tell us
> of the importance of His name.
>
> In conclusion it is very evident that Yahweh's name is important to Him
>
> but it apparently was not important to those who have translated His
> word into the English language.
>
> Therefore we must make every effort when we see His name substituted in
> our scriptures to restore them back as we read them.
>
> We cannot change what has already been done but we can zealously return
> to the faith which was once delivered to the saints.
>

The only "version" which is not a version at all but rather a
perversion, that has YHWH in the NT is the NWT. Further, since the
bibles use LORD to translate YHWH from the Hebrew, there is no reason
that one cannot understand that the divine name is used. Further still,
since NO ONE know HOW to pronounce the name, YHWH, using a pronounceable
word, LORD is quite good in fact.

Also, note that these versions which dutifully translate YHWH as LORD,
NEVER use LORD int the NT since YHWH in never used there.



Gary

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))