No such action

From Kristos Vocabulary Booster

The action specified by the URL is not recognized by the wiki

Return to Main Page.

In article <130.59.21.05.665455000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...
>
>Stephen M. Adams wrote:

[snip]
>> There is no way to answer a straw-man argument directly. Not without
>> conceding something that we will not concede (because it is not true).
>> Namely, that we are 'arminian' which we are categorically not.
>>
>> Since Loren has created an either/or false dilemma, there is no way
>> to answer his question directly. When he's willing to admit that
>> there is a 3rd way, then we can have a fruitful discussion.
>>
>
>Or, you could save us the trouble and tell us what this third way is.

Unfortunately, that would not "save you the trouble". Not as long as you cling
so tightly to your own false assumptions that encourage you too, to insist on
this "either/or false dilemma".

And yes, I have seen from your previous posts that you do insist on this same
false dilemma. Worse yet, when the evidence was presented to you that it _is_ a
false dilemma, you ignored it.


--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))