No such action
From Kristos Vocabulary Booster
The action specified by the URL is not recognized by the wiki
Return to Main Page.
In article <092.49.13.05.215955000@srcbs.org>, Bart Goddard says...
>
>
>
>nnalyd@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>> Jehovah's Witnesses hold that the archangel Michael is Jesus Christ,
>
>This isn't the problem. A case can be made that Michael is the
>pre-incarnate Christ, but not a definitive one. If it turns out
>that Michael is Jesus, then Michael is True God. The JW's
>confess that Michael is created. (Note that Luther believed
>that the "Angel of the Lord" which appeared to Joshua was
>the pre-incarnate Christ. )
Luther was neither the first nor the last to believe this. There's nothing wrong
with this belief. But this "Angel of the Lord" is never named. So no, there is
NO reason to suppose (as the JWs might) that this is Michael.
So what Bart says is true and interesting, but might only muddy the waters in
this thread.
--
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))
