会

From Kristos Vocabulary Booster

• Alternate form: 會

• Radical: 人+4

• Stroke number: 6

• Stroke order:

• Four-Corner System:

• Cangjie input: 人一一戈 (OMMI)

• Graphical Significance and Origin:

• Common Meaning
  1. assemble, meet together
  2. meeting

Chinese Hanzi

• Romanizations
  • Mandarin:
    • Pinyin: huì (hui4), kuài (kuai4), guì (gui4)
    • Wade-Giles: kuei⁴, hui⁴, k'uai⁴
    • Yale:
  • Cantonese
    • Jyutping:
    • Penkyamp:
    • Yale: wui2, wui4 wui6

• Style: Simplified Chinese
  • Traditional equivalent: 會

Verb

1. get together.
2. meet.
3. can. be able to.

Compounds

1. huì
   • 会标
   • 会餐
   • 会操
   • 会场
   • 会话
   • 会见
   • 会客
   • 会儿
   • 会谈
   • 会议
2. kuài
   • 会计
   • 会计师

• Other info:

Japanese kanji

• Readings
  • On: かい (kai), え (e)
  • Kun: あう (au), あつまる (atsumaru)

Compounds

• 会意
• 会員
• 会館
• 会議
• 会計
• 会見
• 会合
• 会社
• 会食
• 会心
• 会席
• 会談
• 会費
• 会報
• 会話
• 会式
• 会得
• 会釈

• Other info:

Korean Hanja

• Pronunciation: 회, 괴

• Romanization
  • The 2000 South Korean Revised: hoe, goe
  • McCune-Reischauer: hoe, koe

Dictionary Information

• KangXi: 0096.121
• Morobashi: 00460
• Dae Jaweon: 0204.110
• Hanyu Da Zidian: 10116.030

Technical Information

• Unicode:
  • Hex: 4F1A
  • Decimal: 20250

hu:会 pl:会

Hey guys, just something id thought you'd want to know about---you can
listen to Tim LaHaye's books for example---all of them---on audio book
through a rental site called Jiggerbug.com!I've been using
Jiggerbug.com for quite a while now, and am LOVING their service. Just
in case, the address is www.jiggerbug.com. Check it out!

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))

Bob Felts wrote:
> Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>In article <115.51.06.05.622976000@srcbs.org>, Bob Felts says...
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>>Since you have not free will, I think that this is the
>>>>consequence.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Romans 7 explains this nicely.
>>
>>It does? Then why does the _interpretation_ of Rom 7 differ so sharply between
>>you, myself, and Gary?
>
>
> If you're going to play the numbers game then I could add a number of
> people to "my" side.
>
> But truth does not lie in numbers. The answer is that the reformers
> were right; you and Gary are wrong.


The "reformers?" Some of the "followers" of Luther and Calvin quickly
departed from some of their doctrines. Further, books have been written
to show by Calvin's own writings that Calvin was not a Calvinist, as
understood by Calvinists.

The "reformers" were wrong on many things. The ONE thing they, Luther
and Calvin, got right was salvation by Grace through faith, but their
followers have forsaken this, as is well demonstrated by the oft
repeated phrase, "faith comes AFTER regeneration/salvation."

The reformers were NOT inspired any more than Matthew's holy "fathers."

Why you would think that a man born Roman Catholic, John Calvin, could
possibly get everything straight coming from a corrupt church with
corrupt doctrine is beyond me. Further, John Calvin continued to claim
as "right" his part in the murder of Servetus. No repentance. Unlike the
Apostle Paul.

Gary

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post. )))